Download the minutes as a .pdf.
Charlotte Attwood (CA, chair), Charles Board (CB), Philip Brown
(PB), Madeline Grimm (MG), Xanthe Gilmore (XG), Will Miller (WM),
Peppar Cyr (PC), Gareth Mattey (GM), Daniel Zimmerman (DZ), Mich
Liebst (ML), Matt Samson (MS), Isabel Estevez (IE), Dan Bowen
(DB), Rob Gard (RG), Victor Chu & Verity Smith (VC & VS, or Team
V), Chris Wilson (CW), Johan Hendrikkson (JH), Spencer Brennan
Alina Kozlovski (AlKo), Allison Kindig (AlKi), Nard Choi (NC),
Jordan Hatter (JH)
Quorum is 50 % + 1 of the number of members of the MCR Committee.
This correspond to 13 people; 20 were present, so quorum was
3 Minutes of last meeting
No minutes needed to be approved. The minutes of this term’s Open
Meeting will be approved at next term’s Open Meeting.
4 Matters arising
4.1 Committee position reports
Each Committee role described what they’d done so far this term.
GM and DZ have worked on events for next term, and been available
for any welfare discussions.
WM and XG have run a successful film night with mulled wine. The
MCR has been spectacularly decorated for Christmas with the
assistance of others. Work is ongoing for the debate next term,
but a room has been booked and discussions with the SCR are
continuing. Internal Ents have a few exciting ideas for super
hall themes, but these are still highly classified. They are
attempting to track down Scottish speakers for the Burns Night
dinner. Working with Pauline Kiesow (PK), the Charity Raffle at
the Christmas Dinner has been organised.
SB has been focused on handing over last year’s vice president
role; work as Alumni Officer is just starting.
The Stewards have been working to organise the Christmas Dinner.
Team V have organised swaps with Robinson and Johns which were
successful and well-attended; a Churchill swap is coming up, as
is an ice skating trip. So far progress on the planned MCR
jacuzzi has stalled but they are hopeful these issues can be
CB now frighteningly has supreme authority over MCR accounts.
Committee members wanting to be reimbursed should download the
claim form from the website, submit it on paper to CB’s
pigeonhole, and wait for bank transfer or a cheque. Work on this
year’s Budget is continuing, and soon there will be a request for
budget proposals for the coming year. Work on last year’s
accounts with Tobias Wenzel is ongoing.
DB has been working on the Google Doc of Responsibility, which
will ensure good ideas turn into good events. DB is also
attending CUSU council.
JH is working with the JCR on Fair Trade initiatives. There is
also a plan for an energy promises scheme for the New Year;
details to follow.
JK has updated the Committee page on the website to show our
grinning faces, and made a PowerPoint for the Porter’s Lodge
showcasing the gorgeous new MCR Committee. Behind the scenes
there’s been lots of work getting access to the various IT
PC has been involved in providing plenty of welfare advice to MCR
PB has been forcing all the Committee members to read the
Constitution, a challenging task which has finally been
CW and AlKo have been working on the MCR study groups. So far
these have been held on Saturdays but attendance has been
extremely low. They will look at changing these events to a
different day. First preparations for the McLuhan Symposium have
begun. In addition, talks with post-doctoral research associates
(PDRAs) have been held. We are trying to encourage the PDRAs to
become more involved in MCR life; they’re full members and
welcome at all events, but this may not have been made clear
enough to them at the start of the year. In addition, work is
ongoing to set up a mentoring scheme where PDRAs would mentor
other members of the MCR, providing advice on life in the ivory
towers of academia, etc.
CA has been involved in many discussions with College on a myriad
of issues. Some members of the MCR were unhappy that they were
unable to book a seat at MCR Christmas Dinner this year because
seats sold out very fast. There is a fundamental problem that the
hall can’t fit all the members of the MCR. A good solution for
next year would be to ensure booking for MCR Christmas Dinner
closes before booking for the joint JCR-MCR Christmas Dinner
(which is often quite poorly attended). Then any MCR members who
can’t get tickets for the MCR Christmas Dinner would still be
able to attend a Christmas Hall. There was general consensus this
was a good resolution to the issue.
4.2 MCR-JCR mentor scheme.
IE has been working with PB on a mentorship scheme where MCR
members would mentor JCR members in their later years to provide
advice about applying for MPhils/PhDs, details about the
realities of postgraduate study, etc. Details of the scheme are
basically ironed out. We would ask for volunteers among the MCR
for mentors who would be willing to answer their mentees’
questions, and also take them to Grad Hall once a term or so to
have a chat about postgraduate life. These mentors would list
their areas of experience (e.g. “Gates Scholar” or “Did a Masters
in the US”). The JCR would do the hard work of matching up
mentors and mentees; the scheme would likely be restricted to
initially 3rd year JCR members, extended to 2nd year if there is
sufficient interest on both sides. IE suggested that one
possibility was to add the mentorship information to the already
existing list of Academic Interests set up by AlKo and CW.
However it was felt that this would probably work better as a
separate scheme, to ensure that we only get MCR members who are
actually keen to do some mentoring. PB suggested we’d rather get
a small number of interested mentors who will actually help their
mentees than a large number of more apathetic mentors. In
addition, we should strongly encourage mentors to bring their
members to Grad Hall once a term, as this will provide an
extended period for mentees to have a detailed discussion with
their mentors, which cannot be done by email.
CA said that essentially the scheme sounded good. The only
remaining issue was regarding events containing the MCR, JCR and
alcohol, which have often raised concerns with College. However,
the Domus Tutor had been asked, and said that as long as only
older years of the JCR (in particular, members certainly older
than 18) were involved, and the scheme had an academic focus,
then there should be no problems, but this should be cleared with
the Senior Tutor.
Action: CA to raise with Senior Tutor. Once permission granted,
IE and PB to ask for MCR volunteers and pass list to JCR.
4.3 Accommodation representatives
CA raised the issue of accommodation representatives for each
graduate housing block. In previous years, there has been one
representative per building, whose role is to co-ordinate issues
regarding accommodation from residents. In general this role
tends to require little work – for everyday issues, the usual
Maintenance Request form can be used. The role is more intended
to represent the interests of residents to the MCR Committee when
more serious issues arise; for example, last year when Bateman
Street houses had many problems, the Bateman representative
collated issues and pressured College to take action.
Volunteers were sought from the MCR Committee. The following
members were coerced into taking on the role.
Walter Christie Charles Board
Launcelot Fleming Philip Brown
Herrick House No members present. CA will ask AlKo if she’d be
willing to do this role.
Bateman Street Verity Smith
New Build Daniel Zimmerman
Action: list of these representatives to be circulated to the
wider MCR by PB. Accommodation representatives to deal with any
issues presented to them. CA to ask AlKo about representing
4.4 Holiday arrangements for MCR members
CA mentioned that in the past there had typically been a few MCR
members around over Christmas (in particular international
students), and we should put in place activities to ensure social
events continue over this period. These arrangements are
typically informal but allow any remaining MCR members to e.g.
have Christmas dinner together if they want to. This will likely
just take the form of a Facebook group to co-ordinate events. The
numbers involved are typically small. JH said he should be around
over this time to organise events.
Action: JH to take the lead in setting up a group for MCR members
who’ll be present at Christmas.
4.5 Discussions with Domus Tutor
CA has been in contact with the Domus Tutor (AA), Andrew Arthur,
regarding how permission is granted for MCR events. In
particular, this arises from issues with Halloween Hall this
year, where MCR members were forbidden from wearing fancy dress
to a Wednesday Grad Hall because fellows may be present.
These discussions have been productive, and AA had been extremely
helpful in providing clear and accurate information. AA is
putting togther a document which will list the details of various
College events (for example, “Wednesday Grad Halls cannot be
fancy dress and capacity must be limited to this; for a Friday
superhall these options are possible…”) which could be very
useful in allowing the MCR to plan dinners.
In addition, CA also raised the price of superhalls with AA. Many
MCR members believe superhalls are quite expensive; this issue
has also been raised with College. Discussions have found that
the price of superhalls can’t be made significantly cheaper –
coffee after the meal could be removed, but this will provide a
saving of less than £1. Currently the MCR does not subside
superhalls and this is part of the reason for the expense.
However College would have no problem with superhalls being
subsidised; this money will need to be found from the MCR budget.
Action: CA to obtain document from AA setting out College
regulations on events. Committee to continue looking at the
possibility of subsidising superhalls.
4.6 Update on ongoing rent negotiations
CA and MS presented an update on an issue that is hopefully only
the middle chapter in this ongoing epic saga. For those members
not present last year, a brief summary was provided. The MCR is
engaged in a discussion with College over the level of rent rises
for some Wychfield accommodation next year, which are as high as
10 % on some properties. Full details are set out in a document
available from MS setting out the MCR’s opposition to the rises
and explaining our arguments.
This document has previously been circulated to a select group of
fellows; however at the end of his reign last year MS felt it had
become necessary to raise the issue with the entire Fellowship.
The document has therefore been put on the agenda for the
Governing Body meeting on 1st December 2015.
CA explained that she was hoping to push for more transparent
discussions on rent, in particular a formal procedure that goes
through College’s Finance Committee. The ideal would be a
procedure where the Bursary would present its proposals to the
MCR a month in advance, giving the MCR a chance to prepare a
counter-proposal. In the past the MCR feels it has been
disadvantaged in rent discussions through the lack of a
transparent procedure, and the implementation of this would be
MS and PB are to present the proposal to the Governing Body
meeting, and field any questions. The planned approach is to be
brief and allow the document to speak for itself, as well as
accepting that resolution is likely to come only at the Finance
PB added that realistically it may be hard to avert the 10 %
rise, though we will try. This is likely something that is best
done in next term’s Finance Committee meeting anyway. A
successful outcome would be the implementation of a more
transparent rent discussion procedure, which should stop this
issue arising in future years.
Action: MS and PB to present the position statement on rent to
Governing Body on 1st December. MCR Exec to continue discussions
with College requesting a more open rent discussion procedure for
future years. The issue of the 10 % rise (and clearer discussion
procedures) to be brough up in Finance Committee meetings next
4.7 Uploading of minutes to web page
PB raised the issue of uploading MCR meeting minutes to the MCR
web page. In addition to uploading them as a .pdf, he advocates
also uploading them as a separate web page. This means the text
would be searchable, making it very much easier for future MCR
Committees to find information about the actions of their
predecessors. This would be relatively little work for the
Secretary, and hopefully greatly increase institutional memory in
the MCR. However, for the page to be searchable it could not be
uploaded behind a Raven login, so the information would be
public. PB accepted there could be concerns with MCR members
having their names and views on issues posted on a public
webpage, particularly regarding issues that are contentious with
College. He stated that of course the meeting minutes would be
phrased diplomatically where necesary to avoid any problems. The
idea of uploading to a separate webpage was inspired by the JCR,
who already do this and whose minutes were an extremely useful
source of information on rental negotiations.
Members of the Committee stated that the minutes should only be
uploaded after they’ve been approved at the next Committee
meeting. This will provide ample time for anyone uncomfortable
with how their viewpoints are portrayed in the minutes to raise
it the Secretary. PB agreed that certainly this would be the
case. The motion was put to a vote.
Vote: For: 15. Abstained: 2. Against: 3. Motion passed.
Action: PB to upload minutes to the MCR website as a webpage as a
well as a .pdf, after they’ve been approved by the next meeting.
5 Any other business
5.1 Electrical heaters in accommodation
JH raised the presence of electrical heaters in student rooms as
an environmental issue. These heaters are a very inefficient way
of heating accommodation. CB said that in Walter Christie there
are both wall radiators and electrical heaters; this is the case
for most student rooms.
Questions were raised about the cost of using these heaters.
Unlike the water radiators, the cost of electricity for these
heaters is not included in room rent. VC answered this
decisively: leaving a radiator on continuously for a term costs
~£30. He knows because he does this. Much outrage ensued on
CB said that it’s unclear what can be done about this. College
will almost certainly refuse any requests for electrical
radiators to be removed.
5.2 Christmas Charity Raffle
Xanthe raised the plans for the Charity Raffle at MCR Christmas
Dinner this year. This is being organised by PK, XG and WM. A
number of prizes have been donated by members of the MCR and
College. These include a baked good of your choice from CA, a toy
dog wearing Trinity Hall attire from the Alumni Office, and a
full post-doctoral fellowship provided by Dr. Bartels. MCR
Committee members are advised to bring money to buy raffle
tickets, which will be £1 each.
Action: Christmas Raffle to go ahead. CA to make requested baked
5.3 Milk delivery for the MCR
VC asked whether it was possible for regular milk deliveries to
the MCR. A surprisingly extended discussion about the milk
VC asked for there to be 1 pint a day delivered, as had happened
in the past. JH said that from the Green Officer point of view
there were no problems. WM asked what type of milk should be
delivered. Extensive discussion decided on semi skimmed, not
CB raised objects on the grounds of price. The milk delivery can
be obtained from College so isn’t hugely difficult, but we should
check how much this would cost – potentially a bottle a day could
be a few hundred pounds a year, which is a not insignificant part
of the MCR budget.
RG asked about the details. Will this be done at the weekends,
only during term time, etc.? CB said that we should begin with a
trial period; if we end up with the MCR fridge becoming
overwhelmed with milk we can review the situation. RG laconically
agreed. The motion to reinstate the milk order, to be run by the
Stewards, for a trial period of an unspecified duration, was put
to a vote.
Vote: For: 19. Abstained: 1. Against: 0. Motion passed.
Action: RG to lead, contacting College and keeping an eye on the
milk situation. This issue to be reviewed later.
6 Date of next meeting
There will be a meeting near the start of Lent term; this is to
be decided closer to the time.